2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

knowledge sharing techniques for engineering teams

Why engineering knowledge disappears as teams scale (and how to fight it)

Discover five practical ways to scale knowledge sharing across engineering teams and reduce onboarding time, bottlenecks, and lost context.

Marie Starck
Mar 4, 2026 ⋅ 6 min read
replay march 4

The Replay (3/4/26): Eng knowledge gaps, OpenClaw, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the March 4th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Mar 4, 2026 ⋅ 27 sec read
podrocket open claw an the ai shift

Open Claw, AI agents, and the future of developer workflows

Paige, Jack, Paul, and Noel dig into the biggest shifts reshaping web development right now, from OpenClaw’s foundation move to AI-powered browsers and the growing mental load of agent-driven workflows.

PodRocket
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 47 sec read
Headless UI Alternatives: Radix Primitives, React Aria, Ark UI

Headless UI alternatives: Radix Primitives vs. React Aria vs. Ark UI vs. Base UI

Check out alternatives to the Headless UI library to find unstyled components to optimize your website’s performance without compromising your design.

Amazing Enyichi Agu
Mar 2, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now